This panel discussion was organized by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and the United Nations Development Fund. MS Margaret Mensah-Williams, VP of the National Council of Namibia was the moderator and introduced the session by saying that violence impedes women’s political participation in many countries and went on to define political violence as utilizing violence to meet a political objective and further that it is any act or threat, coercion, intimidation or physical harm during the electoral process, through culture, religion or patriarchy. She pointed out that electoral democracy, which was thought to bring freedom to many countries, comes at a high price for women, is not well documented, is under reported and has had little global response.
The panellists (from South Africa, SE Europe, Zimbabwe) and gave examples of violence pre-election, on polling days and after the elections. Fear is created to the point that it prevents women from registering as voters and running as candidates, and prevents the community for supporting women candidates. Pre-election women candidates often experience verbal harassment, insults (How can a women lead?), attacks in the media, threats to safety, physical harm, kidnapping and assassinations. Supporters of women candidates can face threats, intimidation, physical violence and rape. On polling days, intimidation keeps voters away, and there are often threats from husbands, chiefs and tribal elders. The placement of ballot boxes is critical and is often in locations that can be monitored by elders. Women are often sent to revote for their husband’s choice of candidate. After the elections the results are often contested, violence breaks out, and media ridicule is intensified. In the Balkins, hate speeches and rape are used systemically to scare the women candidates. As well, bombing of the legislature is common when women attend.
Challenges raised were: conservative backlash, misogyny, extreme religious leaders, laws in place but not enforced, women’s lack of personal identity (discussed through her relationships -wife, mother) and media ridicule and discrimination (reporting context-her dress and appearance) and not reporting on their positions on content or issues such as budgets, etc.
Strategies suggested were that:
-develop ways to documentation of women’s experiences, track violence during elections and create global indicators
-train police and other institutional members to provide security pre, during and after elections
-Within parliaments ensure codes of conduct, and hold political parties accountable for the behaviour of their people, through Dispute Resolution Committees
-Legislation such as CEDAW, 1325 domestic laws need to be enforced
-Health care needs to be in place to facilitate disclosure, and help women who experience rape
-Development of a media monitoring kit, who is watching the media? How are they being challenged?
-Development of mentoring systems and training systems, so women learn how to run for office and gain experience (say at the local government level) and understand the realities they face
-Develop quotas-that ensure gender equity, fund women equally to run
-Connect with parallel electoral campaigns in other countries, maintain regional connections and develop strong advocates with global NGO’s
One of the strongest and most effective strategies the women have used is to form women’s caucuses or coalitions that are across party lines. They meet separately and strategically plan how to vote on issues around code of conduct in the legislature, develop and pass domestic violence bills, plan how to mentor young women and generally create space for women to speak in the government. They must vote in solidarity on these issues and not by party lines. Through this partnership with one another they have found some changes have occurred. There is much to be done before women will be safe and supported in politics.
Reporter:: Joan Merrifield, British Columbia Teachers' Federation
Recent Comments